The open carry debate
Apparently, open carry increases the likelihood of negligent discharges. Or something.
Apparently, open carry increases the likelihood of negligent discharges. Or something.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
April 26th, 2012 at 10:19 am
Kinda neat that all the people against open carry receive significant funds from the Joyce Foundation, and most its their primary income.
grassroots!
April 26th, 2012 at 10:51 am
I do not open carry. I think people should have the right to open carry, but I personally have made the decision to not open carry.
April 26th, 2012 at 11:06 am
Then you have the people who are deeply invested in the concealed carry training industry that always seem to argue against open carry.
Can’t imagine why.
April 26th, 2012 at 11:35 am
Let’s see. How about “Private Citizens should not be ALLOWED to “Occupy” in Public. “Occupying” in Restaurants and in Parks intimidates the Public, wastes Law Enforcement Resources, and can lead to people being injured and killed.”
And I defy her to tell me that more people have been injured or killed accidentally by “Open Carriers” than have been injured or killed in “Occupying.”
April 26th, 2012 at 11:41 am
Probably due to people not trying to cram firearms into places with fabric trying to encroach on trigger space.
April 26th, 2012 at 12:05 pm
Even those of us who don’t open carry (I include myself) we are all concealed carry, because there is always the event of a wardrobe malfunction of your carry garment.
Those who oppose open carry believe that a person who gets their shirt blown up, or their gun accidentally uncovered should go to jail.