Making the switch
JT on 9mm v. 11.5MM. Were I to live in a ban state, I’d likely carry 45ACP just because the slight increase in performance of the round and count doesn’t matter.
JT on 9mm v. 11.5MM. Were I to live in a ban state, I’d likely carry 45ACP just because the slight increase in performance of the round and count doesn’t matter.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
June 7th, 2012 at 10:53 am
I sold my only .45 and replaced it with what is also my only 9mm. It was more about cost to shoot than anything else.
June 7th, 2012 at 11:18 am
Meh, even in Mass I’d still just get myself a Kahr TP9 for my primary gun and PM9 for my backup…but I’m already invested deeply in .45 ACP, and have a perfectly good 1911…so why fix what isn’t broke?
I certainly don’t steer new shooters to .45, because its just so much cheaper to shoot 9 and it works just as well.
June 7th, 2012 at 12:04 pm
It’s only two and a half millimeters, and I live in a round-limited state, so I need to practice mag-dumps and re-loading anyhow. But weight (and size) can matter after a day of lugging it around.
June 7th, 2012 at 12:57 pm
If a single big hole was better than a couple smaller ones, and every shot made contact every time, we’d all carry .60 cal lead ball muzzle loaders.
This is a tired subject, that was created to drive site traffic. Sorry if anyone gets butt hurt from my opinion on this.
June 7th, 2012 at 1:01 pm
Tired topic, but still valid to discuss. As always with a topic like this, it’s the factors not considered which reopens the subject. Take flash-mob violence, for example….
June 7th, 2012 at 1:19 pm
Shoot what you want, as long as you shoot it well.
June 8th, 2012 at 10:00 pm
Why switch? Not trying to argue, just asking. A Glock 30, single stack, in 9mm, with a POSITIVE thumb safety, that’s my dream. They should be in vending machines, across the southeast. You had an 11.5. Now the new one is just as good. I know you will hate hearing this, but…