The really sad part is that what he is trying to accomplish just might be achievable. But not by him nor his lawyer. Um, wait, isn’t he representing himself? Eh, still applies. 🙂
Like Unc says, leave it to the experts. If you are going to do something illegal by statute (albeit, unconstitutional), for the purpose of challenging it, have a plan that has a chance in hell of working.
So many ignorant comments. My lawsuit challenged tca 39-17-1307. I am pro se and my case is solid. If I had broken any law 3 years ago why would they allow to sell machine guns and silencers?
July 27th, 2012 at 9:54 am
“Loaded AK47 pistol?”
Was he reading Robb’s gun guide for journalists, or was the reporter?
July 27th, 2012 at 10:06 am
“Bless his heart” – I assume you mean that in the Southern sense?
July 27th, 2012 at 10:57 am
Sadly, AD, it’s a Draco, which is an AK pistol. http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/69679
That said, Embody is an idiot. There are some people you wish weren’t on your side.
July 27th, 2012 at 11:42 am
Yes alanstorm, in every form of the Southern sense…
July 27th, 2012 at 12:15 pm
AD: Embody = kwikrnu, a nutcase that got caught open carrying in a park a stockless AK pistol with a flash hider that was painted airsoft orange.
He pops up on the various forums and blogs to tell us all how anti-gun we are. A websearch of his handle is very informative.
July 27th, 2012 at 12:17 pm
And yes, TN law forbade what he did. Unconstitutional, yes.
But Embody is definitely not TN’s answer to calguns.net.
July 27th, 2012 at 12:32 pm
The really sad part is that what he is trying to accomplish just might be achievable. But not by him nor his lawyer. Um, wait, isn’t he representing himself? Eh, still applies. 🙂
Like Unc says, leave it to the experts. If you are going to do something illegal by statute (albeit, unconstitutional), for the purpose of challenging it, have a plan that has a chance in hell of working.
July 28th, 2012 at 3:35 am
For a second, I thought Embody was the old guy on 60 minutes that’s always bitching about something. Oops.
July 28th, 2012 at 8:18 pm
We have the right to keep and bear arms, except when we don’t. Same old, same old.
July 29th, 2012 at 7:59 am
The author of that article did not read the courts judgment.
July 29th, 2012 at 8:04 am
So many ignorant comments. My lawsuit challenged tca 39-17-1307. I am pro se and my case is solid. If I had broken any law 3 years ago why would they allow to sell machine guns and silencers?
July 29th, 2012 at 12:47 pm
Pro se is another word for loon.
July 29th, 2012 at 1:29 pm
If your case is so solid, then why do you keep losing?
And the reason you sill have your FFL and an SOT is because you committed a misdemeanor, and not a felony, retard.
July 31st, 2012 at 2:17 am
What misdemeanor? Wrong again.