It’s sad but I had the same initial thought when it was reported that the Border Patrol agent was killed by friendly fire. I fully expected it to be a F&F gun.
Has “friendly fire” been used to cover-up the premeditated elimination of a “threat”?
I’ll leave it to your imagination as to what threat? But consider; border patrol, gun smuggling, payment and acceptance of bribes; the slain person’s access to files, conversations, what have you . . .
October 7th, 2012 at 10:46 pm
Yet more evidence that government thugs, er *ahem* officials, are the only ones competent to carry guns.
October 8th, 2012 at 1:47 pm
It’s sad but I had the same initial thought when it was reported that the Border Patrol agent was killed by friendly fire. I fully expected it to be a F&F gun.
October 8th, 2012 at 7:47 pm
Someone is overlooking the obvious question.
Has “friendly fire” been used to cover-up the premeditated elimination of a “threat”?
I’ll leave it to your imagination as to what threat? But consider; border patrol, gun smuggling, payment and acceptance of bribes; the slain person’s access to files, conversations, what have you . . .
October 9th, 2012 at 3:04 am
Taking out a whistleblower, eh? That’s an angle I hadn’t thought of.