A Liberal’s Case for the Second Amendment
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
November 19th, 2012 at 8:20 pm
More evidence that we are winning. Also, I made the mistake of reading the comments. Some serious stupid going on there.
November 19th, 2012 at 8:47 pm
As soon as I heard the interview on NPR, I ordered the book for my Kindle.
Not the easiest read (some pretty tedious details around the colonial times and constitutional history), and I’m less than half way through the book, but so far, it seems like a fairly balanced and objective.
November 19th, 2012 at 9:25 pm
I used to like asking my leftist acquaintances “for 8 years, you screamed about how Bush was going to suspend elections in ’08. If he HAD, explain to me how you would resist?”
I suspect that protesting with Che T-shirts and giant paper mâché puppet heads wouldn’t impress someone who just suspended elections.
November 19th, 2012 at 11:31 pm
I thought the liberals case for the 2nd amendment was to protect themselves from all those gun nuts… Or it could be more of an Accepting the inevitable.. Vanderboegh said it best. Try and take our guns and we will kill you.. Seems to me either way its a case of if you can’t beat’em join’em
November 20th, 2012 at 9:17 am
Liberals have always been for guns – in the hands of their forces. What liberals are not for, in general, is the individual right of self defense, or the individual right to keep and bear arms.
Totalitarians love guns, as long as they are used only by the totalitarians.
November 20th, 2012 at 4:40 pm
Listening to that ‘interview’ reminded me once again why I’m so glad I finally left NY and moved to TX.
.