I think they also mean regular capacity
8 Responses to “I think they also mean regular capacity”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 17th, 2012 at 4:14 pm
Running in our favor 70/30 right now. Disappeared in 3… 2… 1…
December 17th, 2012 at 5:11 pm
What is sad is these fools don’t realize the nut could have just had a knife and a door blocking rod (put it under the doorknob) and done the same amount of damage.
December 17th, 2012 at 5:12 pm
Sure they don’t mean “Newsweek” and “People”?
December 17th, 2012 at 5:13 pm
One full magazine, emptied at the killer as he came in through the window, would have prevented this tragedy. The more cartridges that were in that magazine, the better.
However, no magazines, of any capacity, were allowed by law. Gun free school = school full of dead kids. Gun control kills – put up resistance!
December 17th, 2012 at 5:29 pm
Winning, 71.8%, 5663 to 2229.
December 17th, 2012 at 5:52 pm
It’s ok, we’re #winning.
December 18th, 2012 at 12:49 am
It’s time we had a serious conversation about that polling data.
December 18th, 2012 at 9:47 am
Front page story today in the paper WSJ was how “the tide of the gun control debate has changed,” and reasonable people now support “high capacity magazine” and assault weapons bans. Murdoch has been pulling out the stops, and it’s clear he is going to use the WSJ and Fox to try to scare the Repubs into rolling over on a new assault weapons ban.
I cancelled our WSJ subscription this morning. Not really a believer in the power of boycotts, but I now find it hard to justify giving a foreigner hundreds of dollars a year to help him propagandize against my individual rights. Up to you how you spend your money, but now you know.