A lie repeated often enough
NO: Would Adam Lanza’s Rifle Have Been Covered by the Federal ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban?
But that bit will be diligently parroted.
NO: Would Adam Lanza’s Rifle Have Been Covered by the Federal ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban?
But that bit will be diligently parroted.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
December 19th, 2012 at 1:56 pm
I thought that Feinstein’s bill would attack all semi-autos, regardless of whether they were rifles or pistols. Is it actually a rehash of the Clinton ban? It’s still evil, though.
December 19th, 2012 at 2:11 pm
So long as the school policy is shelter-in-place, the type of gun is irrelevant. You would bleed out from a .22 or a stab wound before the police get to you.
December 20th, 2012 at 9:53 am
It wasn’t his rifle. He stole it.