@Tam I think there is a credible case to be made for keeping the mission of the government clear, simple, and easy, in order to be likable. The more the .gov does, the more it will fail. If you want to be well loved and liked, you can’t do too much.
Could it be possible that liberals would agree to a likeable, but smaller government?
In the world where brand matters, you must be intentional about creating and maintaining it.
The government understands that brand matters, hence the purchase of likes, but doesn’t understand why they are not liked.
July 16th, 2013 at 8:01 am
Yeah, if *only* it were 630k…
July 16th, 2013 at 9:49 am
Wouldn’t it be cheaper to just, you know, be likeable?
July 16th, 2013 at 10:12 am
@Tam I think there is a credible case to be made for keeping the mission of the government clear, simple, and easy, in order to be likable. The more the .gov does, the more it will fail. If you want to be well loved and liked, you can’t do too much.
Could it be possible that liberals would agree to a likeable, but smaller government?
In the world where brand matters, you must be intentional about creating and maintaining it.
The government understands that brand matters, hence the purchase of likes, but doesn’t understand why they are not liked.
You can’t make everyone happy.
July 16th, 2013 at 11:42 am
I assume this explanation is less embarrassing than what they really spent the money on.
July 16th, 2013 at 6:34 pm
“What’s puzzling you is the nature of my game”