The family should sue the bejeezus out of this judge. Complete violation of the 1st Amendment. In the meantime, I suggest they rename the kid “Judge-Ballew-Is-A-Dickface Martin.”
I have a cow-orker whose official name is “Messiah” (a cut-down version of some eleventeen-syllable South Indian name for the benefit of us crackas). I must remember to scare him with this tomorrow.
The argument came up during a child support hearing because the father wants the baby to share his last name, and the mother named the baby with her last name. Parents are not married to each other. The judge then unilaterally added the kid’s FIRST name to the case, because it offends her.
Sorry, Baby-Daddy, generally speaking, the mother has the sole authority to decide if the kid will share her last name, or if she is putting the father’s last name on teh birth certificate.
And Sorry, Judge Luu-Ann. Your religious prejudices are NOT relevant to the law. Additionally, your religious bigotry is simply _MISTAKEN_ even within your own religion, in addition to being unConstitutional — the term means “annointed one”, and was used BIBLICALLY to label everything from temple implements, unleavened bread, preists, and even the pagan polytheist Persian emperor Cyrus the Great. Your own SACRED BOOK rejects your claim, you ignorant fundie bigot!
August 12th, 2013 at 8:42 pm
Stupid parents went to court over the kid’s name. Got what they deserved.
August 12th, 2013 at 9:00 pm
Hmmm, that judge has an interesting last name.
August 12th, 2013 at 9:35 pm
10K Hispanics named Jesus are sweating right now.
August 12th, 2013 at 9:48 pm
The family should sue the bejeezus out of this judge. Complete violation of the 1st Amendment. In the meantime, I suggest they rename the kid “Judge-Ballew-Is-A-Dickface Martin.”
August 12th, 2013 at 10:25 pm
jdrush, my hat’s off to you.
August 12th, 2013 at 10:31 pm
I have a cow-orker whose official name is “Messiah” (a cut-down version of some eleventeen-syllable South Indian name for the benefit of us crackas). I must remember to scare him with this tomorrow.
August 12th, 2013 at 10:39 pm
jdrush, kudos.
August 13th, 2013 at 1:00 am
1ST AMENDMENT, RIGHT TO POOR PARENTAL JUDGEMENT
August 13th, 2013 at 9:23 am
Haissem. Nevaeh’s brother. The melborp si devlos.
August 14th, 2013 at 11:34 am
The argument came up during a child support hearing because the father wants the baby to share his last name, and the mother named the baby with her last name. Parents are not married to each other. The judge then unilaterally added the kid’s FIRST name to the case, because it offends her.
Sorry, Baby-Daddy, generally speaking, the mother has the sole authority to decide if the kid will share her last name, or if she is putting the father’s last name on teh birth certificate.
And Sorry, Judge Luu-Ann. Your religious prejudices are NOT relevant to the law. Additionally, your religious bigotry is simply _MISTAKEN_ even within your own religion, in addition to being unConstitutional — the term means “annointed one”, and was used BIBLICALLY to label everything from temple implements, unleavened bread, preists, and even the pagan polytheist Persian emperor Cyrus the Great. Your own SACRED BOOK rejects your claim, you ignorant fundie bigot!