You know those studies are flawed. They don’t take in account houses that have, uh, more than two television sets and other – other things of that nature.
You may as well be ready for the leftist “apology” on this: it was published in 2007. Apparently everything has changed since then. Anyway, that’s the only argument I’ve run across so far.
It does make you wonder why it didn’t make the rounds earlier. Obviously, something-something Bush.
Note, one of the authors is named Mauser, and is sure to be called out on that. Probably a Heckler of the Kochs.
Other arguments I’ve already seen against the study: Statistics are poor, the publication is not a peer reviewed journal but rather a conservative law student review, the authors are known gun rights advocates and the author used “mantra” in the opening paragraph.
August 29th, 2013 at 10:02 pm
You know those studies are flawed. They don’t take in account houses that have, uh, more than two television sets and other – other things of that nature.
August 30th, 2013 at 12:27 am
You may as well be ready for the leftist “apology” on this: it was published in 2007. Apparently everything has changed since then. Anyway, that’s the only argument I’ve run across so far.
It does make you wonder why it didn’t make the rounds earlier. Obviously, something-something Bush.
Note, one of the authors is named Mauser, and is sure to be called out on that. Probably a Heckler of the Kochs.
August 30th, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Other arguments I’ve already seen against the study: Statistics are poor, the publication is not a peer reviewed journal but rather a conservative law student review, the authors are known gun rights advocates and the author used “mantra” in the opening paragraph.