This is a case requiring what John Kerry called “nuance,” what Bill Clinton called “triangulation,” what Hillary called “forgetting,” what Obama calls “what’s best.”
There hasn’t been any proof that the confidential (under law) information on group membership (First Amendment protected) that was given to the FEC for purposes unknown (Voting Rights protected) was used for anything other than legal, honest research into something like diversity studies of political groups.
And those 700 FBI files of political opponents that the Hillary-hired Craig Livingston got his hands on in the early days of the Clinton administration likewise were not ever, ever, never used for anything at all like political coercion, too.
And all that was so long ago! Several years, now. To quote a famous Secretary of State, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
November 5th, 2013 at 10:48 am
Because rules are for little people…
November 5th, 2013 at 3:51 pm
This is a case requiring what John Kerry called “nuance,” what Bill Clinton called “triangulation,” what Hillary called “forgetting,” what Obama calls “what’s best.”
There hasn’t been any proof that the confidential (under law) information on group membership (First Amendment protected) that was given to the FEC for purposes unknown (Voting Rights protected) was used for anything other than legal, honest research into something like diversity studies of political groups.
And those 700 FBI files of political opponents that the Hillary-hired Craig Livingston got his hands on in the early days of the Clinton administration likewise were not ever, ever, never used for anything at all like political coercion, too.
And all that was so long ago! Several years, now. To quote a famous Secretary of State, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”