How about we push for all the suggestions in the linked article, and hey, what the heck, all the suggestions in the comments there, in every state legislature and every session of Congress, and let the other side compromise by only allowing us half of the wish list each time, for about 60 years or so, like the Dems did from 1934 to 1994?
Then we can get back to both sides getting something out of a bill, rather than just one side.
Or how about enforcing the second amendment, arresting anyone in office who opposes it and prosecuting them?
I don’t recall seeing a compromise requirement in the Bill of Rights. If human rights are to be compromised, then they don’t exist. To the contrary; the Declaration says something about rights being “unalienable”.
Save the “compromise” for the politicians’ sentencing hearings.
December 5th, 2013 at 3:06 pm
Yeah well; we all know the answer to that, even if the left will rarely be honest about it.
December 6th, 2013 at 12:02 pm
How about we push for all the suggestions in the linked article, and hey, what the heck, all the suggestions in the comments there, in every state legislature and every session of Congress, and let the other side compromise by only allowing us half of the wish list each time, for about 60 years or so, like the Dems did from 1934 to 1994?
Then we can get back to both sides getting something out of a bill, rather than just one side.
December 6th, 2013 at 2:46 pm
Or how about enforcing the second amendment, arresting anyone in office who opposes it and prosecuting them?
I don’t recall seeing a compromise requirement in the Bill of Rights. If human rights are to be compromised, then they don’t exist. To the contrary; the Declaration says something about rights being “unalienable”.
Save the “compromise” for the politicians’ sentencing hearings.
December 6th, 2013 at 9:38 pm
NO compromise. Fuck em’