First, Glock 42, now Glock 41
Just let the gat out of the bag on the Glock 42, but the G41 is a long barreled version of the G21 but slimmer:
So, I guess the G40 is not to be because people might think it’s a .40S&W? And we can’t go confusing the Glock 40 with the Glock Fotay.
Kinda disappointed in both guns. I guess in a couple more years we’ll get that single stack 9 after we all bought S&W shields?
January 5th, 2014 at 1:20 am
meh. I’ll keep my 21 for IDPA, it’s served me well.
January 5th, 2014 at 2:10 am
“I guess in a couple more years we’ll get that single stack 9 after we all bought S&W shields?”
It’s funny because it’s true. I really don’t know why Glock doesn’t produce a single stack 9mm. They’re just leaving money on the table for their competitors to take.
January 5th, 2014 at 10:39 am
Remington 51.
January 5th, 2014 at 10:46 am
Why on earth didn’t they call it the G45? Are they saving that designation for something in .45 GAP?
January 5th, 2014 at 11:40 am
Who would have predicted that a new carry pistol from Remington would so thoroughly overshadow Glock’s new entry in the same category?
January 5th, 2014 at 12:34 pm
Glocks are all like Marilyn Monroe: what U see is what you get: broad ass, dumb blonde, low rent chimpanzee ware.
January 5th, 2014 at 4:00 pm
A Glock 20/10mm version would be interesting.
January 5th, 2014 at 4:53 pm
It’s too much to hope for a single stack Glock in 40, or even the long awaited and never developed Glock Carbine in 40 for the model G40, isn’t it?
January 5th, 2014 at 11:41 pm
Interesting, I’m guessing since it takes G21 mags, it’s probably not slimmer where it counts, i.e. the grip.
January 6th, 2014 at 9:24 am
Meh