VA AG: Trusts can’t own machine guns
PDF here. Rumors are that ATF has all forms on hold and may no longer process forms for trusts in VA.
PDF here. Rumors are that ATF has all forms on hold and may no longer process forms for trusts in VA.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
January 16th, 2014 at 8:13 pm
That didn’t take long, did it?
January 16th, 2014 at 8:45 pm
They have to put their fingers in everything, don’t they?
January 16th, 2014 at 10:51 pm
Flip it back around onto the AG. If a trust, under his definition, was omitted from inclusion into the statute, then it stands that the limited definition logic would hold for any other usage within the VA statutes where a trust is used, but not defined for in the statutes.
January 17th, 2014 at 12:35 pm
Sadly, the legal reasoning here (at least when ignoring any 2A implications of registering MGs in the first place) is sound. Now I wonder what this is going to do to all the people in VA who currently own MGs through a trust? How many are going to be charged with felonies before this gets straightened out?
January 17th, 2014 at 4:28 pm
Cuccinelli is a strong legal reasoner, and his interpretation of the specific code in question looks valid. Hell, he’s the most pro-gun AG Virginia has EVER seen, and one of the most pro-gun AGs anywhere in teh nation in teh last 40 years or so. . .
This is the original meaning of the phrase “the exception that proves the rule” — when the legislature SPECIFIES certain things, and does not use “inclusive” language such as “entities such as. . . ” or “similar”, it is legally interpeted as they used EXCLUSIVE language purposefully — so anything NOT specifically called out is excluded.
Trusts are not called out in THAT code, but other “non-natural persons” _are_ explicitly named, and there is no inclusive weasel words to indicate that similar “non-natural persons” are also included. Thus, trusts are excluded.
January 17th, 2014 at 4:43 pm
I would say that CURRENTLY approved transfers to trusts are OK, but new ones would not be. Alternatively, they might require guns owned by trusts to be registered in the name of a particular person.
HOWEVER, this only applies to VIRGINIA’S machinegun registration — which is TOTALLY seperate from and independant of the federal one. I believe you can keep your gun _federally_ registered to your trust, and have it registered with the STATE under one person.
Virginia adopted the “Uniform Machinegun Act” BEFORE the NFA was passed, and we haven’t gotten rid of this zombie law yet (came real close in 2003). UNLIKE the NFA, it is a simple registration, NOT a permission slip — you download a one page PDF form (less info than an ATF 4473), fill it out, and mail or fax it back to the state police. No tax, no background check, no asking for permission.
January 17th, 2014 at 10:57 pm
Thanks for the clarification, Geodkyt. Sounds like a tempest in a teapot, just trying to muddy the waters enough to discourage mere citizens from owning machinegun deathrays.