ATF at work: “discomforting” and “wrenching.”
ATF sends a man deep undercover. Then he’s found out. So, ATF does not protect him and tries to frame him for arson. They also performed illegal surveillance on him. A special agent in charge calls ATF embarrassing.
February 19th, 2014 at 9:46 pm
So after all these years the mainstream media has gotten wind of this case….
February 19th, 2014 at 10:06 pm
Gah! Autoplay video!
February 20th, 2014 at 12:13 am
It amuses me to see a man who has the standard ATF nutty zealotry using it against his own former associates.
February 20th, 2014 at 9:54 am
Has anyone ever realistically had higher expectations for the anti-constitutional, goon squad that is ATF?
All federal firearms laws should be repealed, since they are all unconstitutional, prohibited infringements. That would remove ATF’s dysfunctional firearms function, if it can be said to be a function at all, and thus end the ever ongoing fiasco of ATF.
Without ATF, any gangbanger on the street who wanted a gun could get one. With ATF, it’s the same thing. The difference is ATF’s billion-dollar-a-year budget. Can’t we do better than that?
February 20th, 2014 at 10:46 am
Lie with dogs, get up with fleas.
February 20th, 2014 at 11:20 pm
“A: They were unprofessional. I was embarrassed because that’s not the way we operate, and we should have cleared the bench when that fire happened.”
On the contrary, Very Special Agent Atteberry, that is EXACTLY how ATF operates. As history demonstrates.
Either some of these people actually have a conscience, or something scared them badly to testify under oath this way.
February 23rd, 2014 at 1:49 am
considering it’s Jay Dobyns, I can’t really must any sympathy.