Curious Unc. If you had it your way would you shut down businesses that discriminate against legal weapon carriers? (Unless equality is part time of course;)
By the way TSM made nice use of segregation related photos. It really fluffs the narrative; encouraging outrage, while being irrelevant. Classic propaganda. (Gun banners use it all the time, so its easy to recognize.) Don’t forget to toss in some of the slippery slope doctrine, you know the stuff that never actually happens but sounds scary. Examples being “Obama is going make a law to take my guns” and “It will be the Wild west if guns are legal.” Neither actually happens, but boy do they sound impressive and inflammatory.
Paul, I think you misunderstand. I REALLY DO think people should be able to deny service to anyone for any reason – I just think they should be required to post a sign at the entrance(s) to their places of business and include disclaimers in their advertising specifying those they wish to discriminate against. Then their potential customers can decide whether they wish to spend their money with such bigots. Don’t want legal concealed carry in your store? Fine. I won’t shop there. The market in action.
Simply some protection of people of faith from the predatory lawsuits of the militants. If I wanted a cake in the shape of a gun but my baker didn’t want to do that, I’d say ok and find one that would, vs going around looking for a baker that wouldn’t and suing the first one I found. The high road is nice and all, but if the leftards want to make laws enforcing what the think is reasonable on everyone, we might have to reciprocate.
Thanks for the explanation Kevin. I too prefer the Market to do the work. Personally, I think money from gays is as green as anyone elses. People should have the choice to do what they want, with what they have. Even if it leads to fiscal ruin as several businesses have found out. Its classical economics and it happens every day in the US economy except in when it is artificially controlled for ‘special’ groups.
Here is another quandary. Would it be legal to discriminate, sales wise, against those who ban guns in their own stores but shop at yours? Now this is a question that has ramifications. Can you be rejected for carrying a weapon then reject in turn, those who rejected you?
February 23rd, 2014 at 10:16 pm
Curious Unc. If you had it your way would you shut down businesses that discriminate against legal weapon carriers? (Unless equality is part time of course;)
By the way TSM made nice use of segregation related photos. It really fluffs the narrative; encouraging outrage, while being irrelevant. Classic propaganda. (Gun banners use it all the time, so its easy to recognize.) Don’t forget to toss in some of the slippery slope doctrine, you know the stuff that never actually happens but sounds scary. Examples being “Obama is going make a law to take my guns” and “It will be the Wild west if guns are legal.” Neither actually happens, but boy do they sound impressive and inflammatory.
February 23rd, 2014 at 10:43 pm
Paul, I think you misunderstand. I REALLY DO think people should be able to deny service to anyone for any reason – I just think they should be required to post a sign at the entrance(s) to their places of business and include disclaimers in their advertising specifying those they wish to discriminate against. Then their potential customers can decide whether they wish to spend their money with such bigots. Don’t want legal concealed carry in your store? Fine. I won’t shop there. The market in action.
February 24th, 2014 at 12:25 am
Simply some protection of people of faith from the predatory lawsuits of the militants. If I wanted a cake in the shape of a gun but my baker didn’t want to do that, I’d say ok and find one that would, vs going around looking for a baker that wouldn’t and suing the first one I found. The high road is nice and all, but if the leftards want to make laws enforcing what the think is reasonable on everyone, we might have to reciprocate.
February 24th, 2014 at 8:28 am
Thanks for the explanation Kevin. I too prefer the Market to do the work. Personally, I think money from gays is as green as anyone elses. People should have the choice to do what they want, with what they have. Even if it leads to fiscal ruin as several businesses have found out. Its classical economics and it happens every day in the US economy except in when it is artificially controlled for ‘special’ groups.
Here is another quandary. Would it be legal to discriminate, sales wise, against those who ban guns in their own stores but shop at yours? Now this is a question that has ramifications. Can you be rejected for carrying a weapon then reject in turn, those who rejected you?
February 24th, 2014 at 1:11 pm
Paul: “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.”
So put up a sign at the door:
“If you support or defend (insert long list here) we will not serve you.
“If you denigrate or disparage (insert longer list here) we will not serve you.”
And then deal with your bottom line on your own time.
But keep the government out of it.