I love the idea of a .22 pistol, but the thought of scoring ammo in today’s panic buying makes me cringe. (Everything is in stock now, except for .22!)
The panic is pretty much just in the US; everyone else can get whatever they could before. This guy is Eurozone (2 years to get a permit for a .22? Makes NFA seem tame) so I doubt it’s an issue per se.
I have a Mark II and like it, but a person should at least consider the S&W and Ruger revolvers too. They’re well-built and they digest anything you feed them. A “reliable” 22 self-loader can be picky about ammo and still jams relatively often (FTF, stovepipe, et al) and mine even once had a case blow, which the folks at Remington insist was a firing out-of-battery. Revolvers tend not to do those things.
That being said, I don’t have a 22 revolver, so I can’t comment on how one would perform after eating hundreds of rounds in a day without cleaning. The Mark II tends to gum up, so on several occasions I’ve stopped before I wanted to stop.
I guess I’ve talked myself into getting a 22 revolver…
The Ruger is great, but looking for little springs and pins on the floor after every breakdown gets annoying.
Years ago I bought a Beretta U22 Neos. I wasn’t sold on it looking like Capt. Kirk’s Phaser, but it was under $250 which was my motivating factor. Breaks down in about 5 seconds with the few turns of a locking wheel. Eats all kinds of .22 ammo without a problem. Built in weaver-style top rail for optics. Ergonomically pleasing to shoot. Nice all around cheap way to practice pistol shooting fundamentals.
Hmmm, revolvers didn’t even get an honorable mention, despite being the ONLY rimfire platform that will reliable shoot ANY flavor of 22 ammo, short, long, scatter-shot, or other.
I’d put my 10-shot, S&W 617 w/4″ barrel up against any semi-auto 22 pistol out there.
June 1st, 2014 at 6:40 pm
I love the idea of a .22 pistol, but the thought of scoring ammo in today’s panic buying makes me cringe. (Everything is in stock now, except for .22!)
June 1st, 2014 at 6:49 pm
The panic is pretty much just in the US; everyone else can get whatever they could before. This guy is Eurozone (2 years to get a permit for a .22? Makes NFA seem tame) so I doubt it’s an issue per se.
June 2nd, 2014 at 3:34 am
I have a Mark II and like it, but a person should at least consider the S&W and Ruger revolvers too. They’re well-built and they digest anything you feed them. A “reliable” 22 self-loader can be picky about ammo and still jams relatively often (FTF, stovepipe, et al) and mine even once had a case blow, which the folks at Remington insist was a firing out-of-battery. Revolvers tend not to do those things.
That being said, I don’t have a 22 revolver, so I can’t comment on how one would perform after eating hundreds of rounds in a day without cleaning. The Mark II tends to gum up, so on several occasions I’ve stopped before I wanted to stop.
I guess I’ve talked myself into getting a 22 revolver…
June 2nd, 2014 at 10:43 am
The Ruger is great, but looking for little springs and pins on the floor after every breakdown gets annoying.
Years ago I bought a Beretta U22 Neos. I wasn’t sold on it looking like Capt. Kirk’s Phaser, but it was under $250 which was my motivating factor. Breaks down in about 5 seconds with the few turns of a locking wheel. Eats all kinds of .22 ammo without a problem. Built in weaver-style top rail for optics. Ergonomically pleasing to shoot. Nice all around cheap way to practice pistol shooting fundamentals.
June 2nd, 2014 at 4:16 pm
Hmmm, revolvers didn’t even get an honorable mention, despite being the ONLY rimfire platform that will reliable shoot ANY flavor of 22 ammo, short, long, scatter-shot, or other.
I’d put my 10-shot, S&W 617 w/4″ barrel up against any semi-auto 22 pistol out there.