Thought crimes
Hillary Clinton thinks that you’re a terrorist and that you shouldn’t value constitutional rights. So, why does this “minority” keep winning? Besides, I thought Dems were all about minorities.
She’s advocating banning guns that are already banned. So, she’s ignorant or an opportunist.
June 19th, 2014 at 9:51 pm
Hillary is a scary one!
Maybe it’s just the brain damage.
June 19th, 2014 at 10:35 pm
This is what democracy looks like.
June 19th, 2014 at 11:04 pm
Pretty good article except for confusing the 1968 GCA with FOPA re: machine guns made after May 19, 1986
June 20th, 2014 at 10:49 am
Ignorance? I wish it were so, but it’s much more surreptitiously evil than that…she knows that 97% of the potential electorate actually are. And that’s one of the three prime factors that will put her in the big chair come ’16.
June 20th, 2014 at 6:07 pm
I like to think of Hillary as being similar to the character played by Angela Lansbury in the Manchurian Candidate, who despite representing herself as a supporter of all things tolerant & liberal, and actually being a subversive agent of the Soviets, has her own plan to launch a worldwide nuclear war 10 minutes after getting into office, because she is offended and angry over her amazing discovery that what she has supported all her life is pure evil.
Because “batshit evil totalitarian megalomaniac” just doesn’t do her justice, in my mind.
June 20th, 2014 at 7:43 pm
The US has not been a republic in a long time. Its why batshit crazy people Hillary get into office. The batshit crazy majority votes her in.
June 20th, 2014 at 8:43 pm
So, the three legs of the Hillary stool?
1) The ignorance, gullibility, greed, and laziness of the 97%.
2) The adoration and support of media/entertainment industry.
3) Last but not least, and I’ll take some fire for this one, but she’s a female(somewhat), so she’ll enjoy substantial bipartisan benefit from that. Now mind you, I’d have no problem embracing the free support of those who would allow perceived minority/oppressed gender/race considerations to color, as it were, their presidential preference (a big part of the electoral success of the 0 is of course rooted -heh- in his semi-blackness), it’s just that I would like to see some choices with actual intelligence, libertarian-leaning views, and actual electability (Sorry, Sarah, you ain’t it; I’m talking to Condi and Marco here…).
June 20th, 2014 at 9:55 pm
“So is she’s ignorant or an opportunist.”
She is a ignorant opportunist.
And she does not care anyway for SHE has SS bodyguards.