Funny how a SUPREME COURT RULING back in the 70’s saying Nixon HAD to turn over the Tapes due to a SUBPOENA didn’t bother the Separation-of Powers Argument back then, so why does a Subpoena now?
Of course, if the Republitards would just REMIND those DemoCommies in Open Hearings that a SUPREME COURT RULING IS A SUPREME COURT RULING…..
July 29th, 2014 at 12:17 am
How situational! I doubt she would have said this ten years ago, the lickspittle mendacious statist sycophant.
July 29th, 2014 at 3:05 pm
Funny how a SUPREME COURT RULING back in the 70’s saying Nixon HAD to turn over the Tapes due to a SUBPOENA didn’t bother the Separation-of Powers Argument back then, so why does a Subpoena now?
Of course, if the Republitards would just REMIND those DemoCommies in Open Hearings that a SUPREME COURT RULING IS A SUPREME COURT RULING…..