Yes, yes. But where is the money for background checks for buying a computer? We need the 1st Amendment compromised too with all that child porn out there! Think of the children!
Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer don’t work for MSFT anymore. They are just stupidly rich private citizens with west coast mentalities. It still baffles me why they would waste their gigabucks on such a stupid cause.
I figure they have people working for them that give out the money to the causes that have the best tax writeoffs… Nothing more. It would not surprise me one bit if they no nothing of the causes they donate too.
Seems to me that’s a federal crime under 18 USC 241, “Conspiracy Against Rights”
Sure; under the first amendment you can TALK all you want, describing your insanity-driven belief that guns have evil souls, but when you ACT on it against your neighbors’ rights you have committed a crime.
If getting together an initiative to harass or disincentivize gun owners engaged in peaceable, voluntary exchange, and providing the money and other resources to promote such harassment, isn’t the very definition of a conspiracy against rights, nothing is.
August 19th, 2014 at 11:13 pm
Yes, yes. But where is the money for background checks for buying a computer? We need the 1st Amendment compromised too with all that child porn out there! Think of the children!
August 20th, 2014 at 1:47 am
Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer don’t work for MSFT anymore. They are just stupidly rich private citizens with west coast mentalities. It still baffles me why they would waste their gigabucks on such a stupid cause.
August 20th, 2014 at 8:48 am
I figure they have people working for them that give out the money to the causes that have the best tax writeoffs… Nothing more. It would not surprise me one bit if they no nothing of the causes they donate too.
August 20th, 2014 at 3:17 pm
Seems to me that’s a federal crime under 18 USC 241, “Conspiracy Against Rights”
Sure; under the first amendment you can TALK all you want, describing your insanity-driven belief that guns have evil souls, but when you ACT on it against your neighbors’ rights you have committed a crime.
If getting together an initiative to harass or disincentivize gun owners engaged in peaceable, voluntary exchange, and providing the money and other resources to promote such harassment, isn’t the very definition of a conspiracy against rights, nothing is.
August 20th, 2014 at 11:22 pm
I still like the surface 🙂