PR puff disguised as journalism
It’s like the media is republishing Watts’ own talking points. There is no ‘ban’ at target. And Watts was a PR flack for a big corporation before becoming a PR flack for Bloomberg’s anti-gun efforts.
5 Responses to “PR puff disguised as journalism”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
October 10th, 2014 at 11:44 am
The only thing worth reading on that page are the comments, which appear to be 100% from the good guys. One does wonder if the author (transcriber?) even bothered to look at them.
October 10th, 2014 at 1:54 pm
Would this concerned mom support any new and all existing gun laws being applied to EVERYONE, according to, as some courts have cited on other issues, “the equal protection of the laws”(14th Amendment)? Perhaps she would, but then she would get little or no support from pols who otherwise support such since they EXEMPT THEMSELVES .
October 10th, 2014 at 3:12 pm
Ron, that’s why they love May Issue laws.
Because then they can have their cake and eat it too.
October 10th, 2014 at 4:19 pm
So again, would they want their favorite rights subject to “may issue” permit? Would that be OK for ” a woman’s right to choose?” But not for her to choose carrying the means to protect her body against the robber, the rapist or the murderer??
October 11th, 2014 at 5:29 pm
Ron: If they don’t want the proles to have the same access as them?
Yes.
Why they’re okay with the proles having the same access to abortion (legally speaking) as them is a topic to explore for another day.
But look at things like free speech and campaign spending they were *aghast* at the idea of the little people banding together and having the same influence and advocacy as the “right people”.
Heck the way they organize and push for gun control shows that.