Because it costs money?
Earl walked right through that restraining order:
These Abusers Aren’t Allowed To Own Guns. So Why Aren’t States Removing Them?
Earl walked right through that restraining order:
These Abusers Aren’t Allowed To Own Guns. So Why Aren’t States Removing Them?
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
October 17th, 2014 at 6:50 am
No way that could be abused, right? You do realize that the burden of proof for obtaining a restraining order is probable cause and that they can be issued without notice to the subject? In other words, if a gun-owner’s girlfriend, boyfriend, mother-in-law, sister, brother, adult child, ex-wife or ex-husband gets angry enough to make up a story and tell it to a magistrate, a restraining order will be issued on their word alone. Restraining order issued, cops steal guns, cops “lose” or damage guns, cops refuse to return guns without owner having to hire a lawyer (maybe costing more than the guns involved); what could possibly be wrong with any of that?
So if this silliness becomes law, all a person needs to do to divest someone of their property and their constitutional rights is to tell a lie to a court official. They don’t even have to be particularly convincing because the subject of the RO won’t have the opportunity to offer evidence or cross-examine.
The restraining order system and “shall arrest” domestic violence policies have made enough of a mess, we don’t need to make it worse by adding additional perverse incentives to greedy policemen, vengeful relatives or formerly significant others.
October 17th, 2014 at 11:03 am
Of course the accused must be granted due process before taking his rights away…
October 17th, 2014 at 2:19 pm
But…
1. It’s HuffPo
2. The very “campaign” mud slinging espoused by a certain “Woman”s issues” candidate in Maine.
3. Gabby Gifford seems to be doing the Puppy Dog
tour through NH, with a “restricted” audience for HER “independent organization’s”
last minute, pre election, oratory.
October 17th, 2014 at 3:33 pm
Because they are only interesting in disarming the law-abiding?