Oathkeepers in Ferguson
Guarding from the rooftops. Well, until the police threatened to arrest them for operating without a license.
6 Responses to “Oathkeepers in Ferguson”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 1st, 2014 at 8:40 pm
Ah, yes. The police are ready to arrest them, but allow black thugs and murderers to run wild.
Maybe it’s time for white people to declare war on the police, too.
December 1st, 2014 at 11:28 pm
But the real question is, would operate without a license with?
December 2nd, 2014 at 9:09 am
Now do they get this self defense license where the protesters, looters, burners, etc get theirs?
December 2nd, 2014 at 11:14 am
I wonder if the registration of armed security personnel requires having a contract and payment, and if volunteer watchmen even fall under the registration scheme the city has enacted.
That, and if the police weren’t promising to keep an armed force in front of the store 24/7, I’d tell ’em to write up my ticket. It can’t possibly be more than a citation and fine for having security, without a permit from the city.
December 2nd, 2014 at 11:19 am
Shorter police statement: “We’re not going to protect these people, and we’re not going to let anyone else do it, either.”
December 3rd, 2014 at 1:47 pm
Jake, that is a flagrant and outrageous violation of the most basic “civil right” of armed self defense which is why the nation’s “top cop” would be in total agreement.