Switch blades not protected by the second amendment
5 Responses to “Switch blades not protected by the second amendment”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
January 30th, 2015 at 10:31 am
I blame those darn Jets and Sharks, and their choreographed knife fights.
January 30th, 2015 at 11:42 am
Let’s hope the courts never ask for a comparison of other “legal” knives on those attributes – even my little Buck Mini Spitfire. Just as concealable, with practice just about as fast to deploy for use in a “knife fight”, and I don’t see how it is any less “suitable for criminal use”.
And what the judges consider “regular knives”? Swiss Army pocket knives I suppose?
January 30th, 2015 at 3:13 pm
Disparate treatment; some people have arthritis or other disabilities. Denying someone a right to bear arms because they need a knife that opens easily is discrimination.
January 30th, 2015 at 4:13 pm
Even if you could find someone with such a disability and standing, they would like just re-write the law to allow for exceptions for “qualifying disabilities” like they did with crossbow hunting in NM.
January 30th, 2015 at 9:13 pm
Using SD to get rid of a ban on auto knives is the wrong argument IMHO.
They should get rid of the ban because it’s fucking stupid!