Kids and guns
Family court to father: No guns in the house until child is 18.
A few things: What other civil right can a family court restrict?
At 18, having presumably had no exposure to guns, will the kids be better or worse off should they encounter one?
And this:
Kurt appealed, arguing, in relevant part, that the no-guns order was unjustified and violated the Second Amendment. Andrea appealed, arguing in part that one of the custody factors, “the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, favors her because while there was no expert testimony of Kurt’s mental health, [his gun collection, among other things,] indicates that he has mental health issues and is a risk to M.A.R.R. We are not persuaded.”
Someone argued that gun ownership = mental health issues. Ok, then.
March 20th, 2015 at 5:45 pm
The answer is of course whatever right the court wants to restrict. Family courts are known for ignoring law and the Constitution, usually they get away with it.
It was good to see that the family court got slapped for making this illegal order.
March 22nd, 2015 at 4:22 pm
It is a family court, the bill of rights doesn’t apply to them. I am not kidding, they are as fascist and evil as they come.