I’m not sure that it does: The Third Circuit already has precedent in the other direction — Drake v. Jerejian (NJ)
Then there’s the Second Circuit with Kachalsky v. Cacace (NY), and the Fourth Circuit with Woollard v. Gallagher (MD).
At this point, we’re waiting on the results of the case in the Ninth Circuit, Peruta v. San Diego (CA).
The only way to change the precedent in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Circuits is to have The SCOTUS decide one of these may-issue cases in our favor, and that isn’t going to happen until we have a clear split in the courts.
May 22nd, 2015 at 1:13 am
I’m not sure that it does: The Third Circuit already has precedent in the other direction — Drake v. Jerejian (NJ)
Then there’s the Second Circuit with Kachalsky v. Cacace (NY), and the Fourth Circuit with Woollard v. Gallagher (MD).
At this point, we’re waiting on the results of the case in the Ninth Circuit, Peruta v. San Diego (CA).
The only way to change the precedent in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Circuits is to have The SCOTUS decide one of these may-issue cases in our favor, and that isn’t going to happen until we have a clear split in the courts.
May 22nd, 2015 at 10:14 pm
“Missouri Compromise puts Mississippi plantation slavery at risk.”
May 25th, 2015 at 7:23 pm
It’s a deceptive headline. Looking at the whole piece, it looks like the writer is pro-carry…
May 26th, 2015 at 10:08 am
Let me know when it puts NJ laws at risk.