Well, he is a socialist
Bernie Sanders, the clown show to make HRC look moderate, says choice is bad. If it’s economic choice.
4 Responses to “Well, he is a socialist”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
May 26th, 2015 at 7:34 pm
The question is not whether choice is good or bad. It’s about whether or not it’s anyone else’s fucking business, which it isn’t.
Here’s the problem; Some people want to believe that they can use government-perpetrated coercion to mold and shape a society into something good and wonderful.
Get rid of THAT criminal insanity and everything else is fixed.
Arguing over the details, such as this or that choice or this or that minimum wage or WHATEVER else, with someone so inflicted, is in itself insane.
And so we have the criminally insane on one hand, and the Republicans who lend them credibility on the other.
Example; “What is the right and proper way to rape someone?” (translation; “What is the right and proper way to restrict gun purchases?”)
Republicans (and most of us) will actually argue over the details, rather than throw out the question as bat shit crazy.
So when almost no one ever stands up on principle, when morals and principles themselves become taboo subject, what can we expect to happen? Simple; we end up living in Batshit Crazy Land, where America once stood.
May 26th, 2015 at 7:35 pm
If there’s a kid that’s starving in the USA, there’s either abuse or stupidity (same thing really) at work on the part of the caregivers.
May 27th, 2015 at 10:20 am
But, of course, he’s okay with the Clintons pulling in $30 Million on the speaking circuit – and not having that money taken from them to feed the children that our surfeit of deodorant choices are driving into starvation.
Remember, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, and their successors were living in luxury while the average worker was waiting in line hoping to get some toilet paper before the distribution centers ran out. Socialism seems to include the built-in hypocrisy that the leaders of their “classless” society are of a higher class than everyone else, and therefore deserve a greater share of what everyone else produces.
May 28th, 2015 at 1:19 pm
Ok, I’ll ask it. How does having fewer choices help hungry kids?