“Sporting purposes”

A bill to get rid of that onerous language in federal law. I’d put chance of passing at nil.

Posted in uncategorized on June 11th, 2015 by SayUncle | RSS 2.0 |

Kevin P. Says:
June 11th, 2015 at 10:23 pm
And the chance of Chicago having concealed carry?
Sigivald Says:
June 12th, 2015 at 5:51 pm
They should be sneakier, and make a bill defining sporting purposes as “including but not limited to hunting, target shooting, and any form of competitive shooting historically practiced, currently practiced or devised after [date of enrollment of bill]”.

I can’t think of any firearm that wouldn’t cover – but it’s very hard to make a “clean” political argument against.

“What do you have against organized competitive shooting and target practice, Senator?”
Sigivald Says:
June 12th, 2015 at 5:52 pm
(For a bonus, include “informal short-range shooting [“plinking”]” and “firearms familiarization practice”.

Then they can’t weasel out of even cheap pistols.)

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges

Categories