With a flamethrower
Rand Paul: How would you kill the tax code?
6 Responses to “With a flamethrower”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
July 22nd, 2015 at 5:18 pm
Flame thrower sound good.
As to a “replacement” as regards an “income tax”: one page is waaaay too long and 14.5% is waaaaaay too much. But I’d be in favor of it as a “camels nose in the tent” approach to getting something that is actually appropriate.
July 23rd, 2015 at 12:06 am
Nuke it from orbit. It’s the only way t be sure.
July 23rd, 2015 at 4:39 am
Smash it with the faces of liberal democrats and corporate welfare republicans until it was blood soaked pulp.
July 23rd, 2015 at 8:37 am
Killdozer was not an option,and that saddens me.
July 23rd, 2015 at 10:52 am
I remain unimpressed. The ooh-rah emotional horseshit routine is getting very old, and 14.5% extortion of someone’s income is still 14.5% extortion.
There’s no point whatsoever in discussing the details of the extortion process until we’ve established, with absolute honesty and clarity, the proper role of the federal government.
That being said, I do kinda like Steve Ramsey’s bloody pulp method, for it would at least partially hold some of the perpetrators accountable while making an example for any future would-be perpetrators. Unless and until we have some kind of direct, personal accountability for the extortionists and racketeers operating under color of law, none of this conversation has any meaning to it.
July 23rd, 2015 at 10:28 pm
By making Koskinen eat the whole stack.