Hope and change
A bit back, PDB mentioned on the bookface that Colt was now making 6920s sans furniture (well, a pistol grip to keep springs in). I put that in the back of my mind and, while cleaning out the gun stuff the other day, found that I had a full set of gray Magpul furniture. I purchased the LE6920 from Tombstone Tactical, for a great price ($720 and shipping). After it arrived, I realized it also didn’t have a trigger guard. Anyway, here it is out of the box:
And here it is decked out in gray:
So, basically, $720 for a gun, a few bucks for a transfer, and $150 for Magpul goodies gets you into a damn fine AR-15.
Does this mean the Army will get with the 21st century and adopt JHPs:
At the event today, among changes discussed was policy that now opens up the competition to rounds other than ball (full metal jacket) ammunition.
From the bookface, comes this reddit thread:
Redditors who have had to kill in self defense, Did you ever recover psychologically? What is it to live knowing you killed someone regardless you didn’t want to do it?serious replies only
South Carolina House votes to remove Confederate flag from statehouse grounds
TSA, what with their 95% failure rate:
Pattycakes on The Paper of Making Up The Record:
In short, we have a newspaper 1) running funds that politicians can donate to, 2) keeping those donations secret, and then 3) deciding whether to endorse particular candidates.
“Snuffy” Pfleger, in a ridiculous lawsuit, is suing 3 Chicago suburbs because they haven’t enacted gun control to keep guns out of Chicago. And Reuters says:
A group of civil rights activists on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against three Chicago suburbs to force them to take stricter gun-control measures to stem the flow of weapons into the city’s crime-ridden neighborhoods.
What “civil rights” are they advocating? Seems to me they’re inherently against the fundamental right to arms.
A state appeals courts is set to hear arguments on whether guns should be allowed at University of Florida residence halls.
The 1st District Court of Appeal next Tuesday is scheduled to take up a case filed by the group Florida Carry Inc., which says people have a legal right to possess firearms in their homes, including in university housing. An Alachua County circuit judge last year sided with the University of Florida in rejecting the groups arguments in the case.
In court briefs, Florida Carry pointed to a state law that seeks to ensure people can have firearms in their homes and to the U.S. Constitutions 2nd Amendment. It said the state law about guns in homes supersedes another law that generally bars guns at schools and colleges.
The illegal immigrant who shot a SF woman used a federal agent’s gun.
A look at anti-gun groups’ finances. Brady seems to be fading the fastest.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|