TN Judge won’t grant divorces
what actually appears to be the intent and (more importantly) the effect of the Supreme Court ruling is to preempt state courts from addressing marriage/divorce litigation altogether.
Well, OK.
6 Responses to “TN Judge won’t grant divorces”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
September 3rd, 2015 at 9:00 pm
Speaking as a Tennessee-divorced man, this judge’s refusal to grant a divorce strikes me as cruel and unusual punishment.
September 3rd, 2015 at 9:53 pm
When Arizona codified the federal immigration statutes into state law and everyone freaked the hell out saying that states couldn’t enforce federal law, I was waiting for some enterprising sheriff to announce that his deputies would no longer enforce state laws against bank robbery since it was the same principle.
So I applaud him 🙂
September 3rd, 2015 at 9:54 pm
Prior to the SCOTUS decision on homosexual marriage, the biggest gripe I always read and heard is that it would make just about every court in our free republic a “Backlogged & Costly Kangaroo Court”; an expensive judicial quagmire and mockery, if you will.
Were the critics on to something?
September 4th, 2015 at 1:48 am
OK, this judge is wrong, Mr Journalist.
Explain why, please, rather than just repeat that they are in error.
I hate this kind of article.
September 4th, 2015 at 9:33 am
Hey, it could be worse. The progressives might have gone with support of NAMBLA instead of homosexuality as their wedge issue this year.
September 6th, 2015 at 10:24 am
wizardpc,
You bring up a good point. Isn’t bank robbery a federal crime seeing that the robber is stealing Federal Reserve Notes? So then shouldn’t State and local law enforcement be prohibited from apprehending the perps, but just report the robbery to the Feds?