Love the spinning in the comments. Guy resorts to the no more mass shootings in 20 years (only true if they use the US FBI definition, which they then refuse to use in counting US mass shootings) and implies that since 10 people died in that one incident they would have lost 10 lives per year w/o the ban.
Ignoring their actual homicide rate didn’t change, meaning no net lives can be claimed to have been saved due to the ban.
November 11th, 2015 at 10:10 pm
Love the spinning in the comments. Guy resorts to the no more mass shootings in 20 years (only true if they use the US FBI definition, which they then refuse to use in counting US mass shootings) and implies that since 10 people died in that one incident they would have lost 10 lives per year w/o the ban.
Ignoring their actual homicide rate didn’t change, meaning no net lives can be claimed to have been saved due to the ban.
November 12th, 2015 at 5:41 pm
This is simple; just outlaw crime. Then there won’t be any crime.
How long before that is seriously proposed?