S&W clarifies cease and desist letter
3 Responses to “S&W clarifies cease and desist letter”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 23rd, 2015 at 8:21 pm
If you can’t support your fans, who can you support?
I’m still undecided between the Shield and the 43. S&W needs to get hard in support of its fans if it wants to succeed.
Given the recent turn of events, I’m likely to lose my old steel .45 – Astra A-75, GI style,single stack, double-action and get a Glock single stack. Lots of companies can make a 9mm, but how many make a +P .45 ACP that works? Glock can, but how about all the others?
December 24th, 2015 at 3:09 am
Horse manure, a misunderstanding. This has the signs of a new corporate counsel at S&W who incompetently overreached.
December 26th, 2015 at 10:35 pm
I have a stainless, out of the box stock, Colt series 80 government model that digested Remington 185 grain jacketed hollow point +P to point of aim, without a hiccup from the time I bought it in1989, until supply forced me to switch to golden sabre of the same specs. It runs on those just fine too.