Feminists are so cute
And are, of course, bigoted:
Youve had your chance, bepenised ones. And youve blown it. What youve proven, time and time again, is that you cannot be trusted to behave yourselves after dark.
Aww, you have an opinion. Good for you. Too bad it’s a stupid one. And this one sounds totally made up. Sure, some people are jerks on trains. Some people, not just men.
Seriously, what has happened to feminism? Other than it’s gone insane.
January 25th, 2016 at 2:35 pm
I think it went off the rails sometime in the 1970s, becoming a movement, not for women at all, but to oppose strong men, especially fathers.
It makes sense as a Progressive tool. You can’t overthrow a nation of strong families founded in faith and committed to the principles of liberty. The most efficient way to attack America then was to malign and impugn strong men, especially fathers, and replace the men of the family with government. The man is now to be seen as a useless dolt, and a sex-obsessed criminal or incipient criminal, while everyone else is to be seen as victims, with government being our only hope for protection, sustenance, and “Social Justice”.
“Barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen” has been replaced with pregnant, single and on welfare, voting for Democrats to maintain the gravy train while raising the next generation of Democrat voters.
January 25th, 2016 at 4:32 pm
How can you ensure someone else is financially independent since if you are ensuring it, they are dependent upon you for their financial independence. I’m fairly certain one must ensure their own financial independence.
And why is it okay for this author to call for a halt in men being out after dark with some to be released once they’ve got a handle on the situation, but it is wrong for Trump to call for a stoppage of Islamic immigration until we get a handle on that situation.
Also, note how carefully the author avoids any identifying characteristics of “the men”.
January 25th, 2016 at 5:03 pm
“Seriously, what has happened to feminism? Other than it’s gone insane.”
It’s always been insane. It’s just ceased pretending to be otherwise. Ask a few young college men.
January 25th, 2016 at 6:00 pm
It can’t be an immigration problem in Europe…the immigrants already have a solution in place to stop this kind of thing! The gals just have to stay in their tents and wear niqabs! Problem solved! Non-sharia compliant women are the problem.
January 25th, 2016 at 6:21 pm
They’re addicted to outrage. It makes them feel less useless, despite their journalism and women’s studies degrees.
January 25th, 2016 at 7:10 pm
It (feminism) is a lot like gun control. It’s not about the object, it’s about the control.
January 26th, 2016 at 12:56 am
This is worth a listen to on this topic. Tom Woods covered this last week: http://tomwoods.com/podcast/ep-576-feminism-enemy-of-liberty/
January 26th, 2016 at 9:24 am
Well, Jeffrey H beat me to it. But yeah Yios, Mios? Yanapoulis? The gay Greek dude who writes for Breitbart called it Misandry.
January 26th, 2016 at 10:27 am
On the rare occasions I’ve been on a city bus here in Austin, I’ve never seen a “manspreader” who didn’t immediately close it up when someone, anyone, needed or wanted a seat.
Could it be a regional thing?
January 26th, 2016 at 12:23 pm
Hey, that’s a gender discriminatory statement. As Curly of “The Three Stooges” would exclaim, “I resemble that remark!”
January 26th, 2016 at 4:35 pm
“It (feminism) is a lot like gun control. It’s not about the object, it’s about the control.”
My take on feminists is that they want male-female relations to be like they were a century ago, except with men being subservient to women.
January 26th, 2016 at 9:12 pm
It can be rough being a man in the sights of feminists. It’s no better being a woman in their sights. Like, men are just born evil. Women who aren’t feminists have up and decided to be evil. That’s worse.
The faithful are harder on heretics than infidels.
January 27th, 2016 at 5:38 pm
“The faithful are harder on heretics than infidels.”
Yep. They see a true, “strong woman”, living the way she wants without regard to what the feminists think, and they go apoplectic, then they set out to destroy her.
It’s al pretty simple. The Progressive (incremental communist) movement needs a victim class to justify it’s desire for a more coercive society. Coercion is the goal. All that other bunk is just the means to that end. It’s not insane then, strictly speaking. It’s just a dumb act with a clear agenda behind it. A ruse.
They (the Progressive movers and shakers) know exactly what they are doing, and they’re usually pretty good at it. The fact that we so often become confused and upset by the seeming contradictions is the proof that it’s working– If we saw straight through the act every time, there’d be no confusion at all. Our reaction would be; “Oh, there’s another cheap trick from the Progressive play book. It’ll be sure to sucker the young, the frustrated, the weak and the uninformed. What’s new?”
Our job, then, would be to inform the uninformed, and to help those who are feeling weak. Then we can all forget about the stupid Progressives and carry on with life.