Repeal 14,16, and 17. No grouping multiple laws into a single bill – one subject per bill.
The link mentions Mark Levin. His amendment proposals are neocon pay dirt. They take rights away that 9 and 10 reserve to the people and the states.
The whole thing makes me nervous. The political system is bought and every last politician is whoring out the nation for personal gain and presiding over the destruction of their grand children’s future. What exactly, would a piece of paper do to change this. 90 percent of the proposals I’ve seen are ALREADY the law. Why would other similar laws change anything?
The rules we have now are being ignored, so lets change the rules. Yeah, that’ll work.
I feel the same every time I see someone commenting on ‘their guy’ in a political race. Like they actually believe anything that comes out of the mouth of a politician.
How many times do you need to be betrayed before you wake the hell up?
The last time this happened we went from the articles of confederation to the constitution. There would be literally nothing stopping them from setting up a monarchy if they wanted.
Cart, horse, etc. but I appreciate the sentiment. Perhaps if enough other states – but below the 34 required – join in it will get someone’s attention.
In the meantime, I’d fully support returning to the existing standard – follow the Constitution we have, and if that turns out to be insufficient, then go Article V.
People don’t understand a constitutional convention opens up the whole thing. Anything could be repealed or heavily modified. Including the first 10 amendments. Still want to go that way bunkey???
February 5th, 2016 at 9:38 pm
Repeal 14,16, and 17. No grouping multiple laws into a single bill – one subject per bill.
The link mentions Mark Levin. His amendment proposals are neocon pay dirt. They take rights away that 9 and 10 reserve to the people and the states.
The whole thing makes me nervous. The political system is bought and every last politician is whoring out the nation for personal gain and presiding over the destruction of their grand children’s future. What exactly, would a piece of paper do to change this. 90 percent of the proposals I’ve seen are ALREADY the law. Why would other similar laws change anything?
February 5th, 2016 at 10:44 pm
“Why would other similar laws change anything?”
The rules we have now are being ignored, so lets change the rules. Yeah, that’ll work.
I feel the same every time I see someone commenting on ‘their guy’ in a political race. Like they actually believe anything that comes out of the mouth of a politician.
How many times do you need to be betrayed before you wake the hell up?
February 5th, 2016 at 11:08 pm
This is such an epically bad idea.
February 6th, 2016 at 12:47 am
The last time this happened we went from the articles of confederation to the constitution. There would be literally nothing stopping them from setting up a monarchy if they wanted.
February 6th, 2016 at 9:38 am
Cart, horse, etc. but I appreciate the sentiment. Perhaps if enough other states – but below the 34 required – join in it will get someone’s attention.
In the meantime, I’d fully support returning to the existing standard – follow the Constitution we have, and if that turns out to be insufficient, then go Article V.
February 6th, 2016 at 8:02 pm
Calling for a ConCon when half the country thinks that Obama was too rightwing is really bad timing.
February 7th, 2016 at 1:31 pm
People don’t understand a constitutional convention opens up the whole thing. Anything could be repealed or heavily modified. Including the first 10 amendments. Still want to go that way bunkey???
February 10th, 2016 at 8:50 pm
Everybody knows that blacks are 3/5s of a human!