Maryland appeals
The “assault weapons” case, that is. This should be interesting. And more so given what may happen at SCOTUS.
The “assault weapons” case, that is. This should be interesting. And more so given what may happen at SCOTUS.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
February 22nd, 2016 at 6:44 pm
If your freedom rests on a few assclowns in robes then you’re not free.
February 22nd, 2016 at 8:35 pm
@Fred, True!
And if they ruled that the RKBA was limited to a government militia, then that would put that right back to ” a free State”. But the government has NO rights, only delegated powers. To rule that a right of the people is constrained by government power is totally oxymoronic and contradictory. And even IF so, Article I, Section 8.16 says that “such part of them (the militia) must be EMPLOYED in the service of the United States.”
February 22nd, 2016 at 9:07 pm
Ron W – agreed but, it looks like the .gov don’t care one bit. Rules are for the ruled. There is no general welfare clause either. The words general welfare appear twice. Both are in preambulatory paragraphs describing the the purpose to which the actual delegated authorities are to be applied. The .fed is in violation of every article, the people have never read it, and the politicians don’t follow it. The constitution is, regrettably, void.
February 22nd, 2016 at 11:48 pm
Yes, I agree. The courts and Congress are And have been UNLAWFUL renegades. But just as a matter of court rulings as I understand, if SCOTUS ties, the lower court ruling stands.
But otherwise State Governors and Legislatures and FREE PEOPLE MUST step up and assert their 9th and 10th Amendments. For instance IF SCOTUS ruled, ERRONEOUSLY, that the RKBA was constrained within a government militia, then the right of armed self defense of the People would absolutely be included by the 9th a Amendment and States could assert that with the 10th Amendment and thus restrict the Federal Government’s delegated power to ONLY ZTHOSR IT EMPLOYS.