Like you and me, only better
Charlie Rangel says the law-abiding residents shouldn’t own guns. But, you know, he says that he and his fellow congressweasels “deserve” and “need” armed guard to protect them.
Charlie Rangel says the law-abiding residents shouldn’t own guns. But, you know, he says that he and his fellow congressweasels “deserve” and “need” armed guard to protect them.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
June 23rd, 2016 at 9:43 pm
Didn’t Rangel get convicted on 11 counts of ethics violations?
So you see he is right on the fact that ‘LAW ABIDING’ citizens as compared to crooks. And Rangel is a crook and thus to him he needs protection.
June 23rd, 2016 at 10:19 pm
Those who take from others what they keep for themselves are evil!
ONLY YOUR ENEMY WANTS YOU DISARMED
June 23rd, 2016 at 10:32 pm
‘he says that he and his fellow congressweasels “deserve” and “need” armed guard to protect them.’
Y’know, if they didn’t endlessly do shit that pisses people off that wouldn’t be necessary. And assholes like Rangel are the reason why we good honest Americans need our guns.
June 24th, 2016 at 6:53 am
YES THIS IS REALLY UNFAIR
June 24th, 2016 at 8:35 am
In the words of that famous Robo-American scholar, Bender B. Rodríguez: “Bite my shiny metal a$$!”
June 24th, 2016 at 11:25 am
Considering that he’s a tax cheat, why are we paying for his protection?
June 24th, 2016 at 10:49 pm
I have the perfect idea for the left. Don’t stop at killing the 2nd amendment when the third is so ripe for abuse. Anyone on the no fly list loses their third amendment right and has to quarter a member of our military at their home, this will stop terrorism and we wont have to lose our 2nd amendment rights.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/24/why-should-axing-due-process-stop-with-the-second-amendment/