Bullet Button 2.0
After California mandated something then made it illegal, the inventor of the bullet button came out with a new design to get around the recent ban.
Nice.
After California mandated something then made it illegal, the inventor of the bullet button came out with a new design to get around the recent ban.
Nice.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
July 3rd, 2016 at 1:54 pm
Wow, I hope “Bullet Button” dealers go bankrupt.
This is what a sellout looks like.
July 3rd, 2016 at 1:58 pm
As a Californian with multiple BB-guns, I think it’s brilliant.
Every time the Sacramento One-Party Politburo churns out another unconstitutional law rammed through on a party Line with no public input and no pushback, there’s a simple workaround.
July 3rd, 2016 at 2:12 pm
And someone posited on Tam’s FB page it would take all the way to Tuesday to come up with a work-around.
Look for this to be banned next year.
I wonder what will be developed for all those other rifles out there?
July 3rd, 2016 at 2:45 pm
Something similar for AK’s, but I’d buy M1 Garands as investment capital if I had any money.
July 3rd, 2016 at 5:34 pm
rickn8or:
it’s entirely possible that this design predates his bullet button idea. Any time I was looking at a design idea, I tried to envision as many variations as was feasible, and then picked the one that met the important requirements. Lots of variables get involved in choosing which way to go. Unfortunately, the best ideas aren’t always the ones that get into production. Actually, it’s amazing how often they DON’T get selected by the decision makers. Just the way it goes.
July 3rd, 2016 at 6:41 pm
Can someone provide a summary of the new law that specifies how a “legal” mag release is now supposed to work in CA? You have to disassemble the rifle to reload?
July 3rd, 2016 at 9:25 pm
Don’t worry, this device will be made illegal in CA soon enough.
July 3rd, 2016 at 9:35 pm
Garibaldi, yes. Only situation I know of where compliance with the law is a “loophole.”
July 3rd, 2016 at 10:07 pm
Like the internet, engineers view censorship as damage and route around it.
July 3rd, 2016 at 10:52 pm
Infinite workarounds for infinite idiocy, culminating in the ultimate idiocy and CALEXIT and/or insurrection.
Guy is sharp -and fast!- but please someone tell him to not play into their terminology game wherein he twice called that sport rifle an assaut rifle.
Oh, and surely he can find a quiet place to do his vids?
July 3rd, 2016 at 10:53 pm
…or an assault rifle even.
July 3rd, 2016 at 11:20 pm
JTC, I might be wrong, but it looks like his receiver has the magickal third hole that marks one of the differences between an “assault rifle” and a “semi-auto rifle.”
But yes, nobody on our side of the gun debate should use the term “assault weapon.”
July 4th, 2016 at 12:32 am
rickn8or, if so I missed it, but I submit that it is then an automatic rifle, as I have not heard of any rifle assaulting anyone.
Although of course there are many who prosyletize otherwise, which is exactly my point about the terminology game; I place it right up there with “gun violence”.
July 4th, 2016 at 1:19 pm
In CA before the Bullet Button and the commercial growth and development/expansion of so many “non-Roster” receivers, if you had an AR with a standard magazine latch you were required to register them as an “assault weapon”…
July 4th, 2016 at 2:00 pm
“Don’t worry, this device will be made illegal in CA soon enough.”
Like damn near everything else. Hell, I think that the list of what’s illegal in Commiefornia is longer than what’s still legal.
July 4th, 2016 at 2:32 pm
I will manage to do without California. It’s bad enough having Illinois just two states over.
July 4th, 2016 at 2:48 pm
NotClauswitz, my point exactly. They can and do call shit shinola and want us to do the same, and when we won’t they legislate that shit is indeed shinola. But they can’t and won’t make me call shit anything but shit, especially when it’s my shit. That’s what the BB vid guy did, which is why I called him on that shit.
And what is this “register them” you allude to? Heh.
July 4th, 2016 at 10:24 pm
they’re nearly to the point that 10 or 20k armed men marching on the capital would be a better solution.
July 5th, 2016 at 11:23 am
Correction, he invented this to COMPLY with the law.
July 5th, 2016 at 11:44 am
beatbox, to the liberal mind, complying with the law is a “loophole.”
July 5th, 2016 at 3:51 pm
RAW’s are a thing. When Cali first passed everyone with banned guns already had to register them with the state by a certain date. Then they made them effectively non-transferable…
July 5th, 2016 at 4:57 pm
I certainly hope CA Democrat and state Rep. Lee was importing, for sale to drug gangs, only illegal fully automatic assault rifles that had the original Bullet Button attached. Otherwise, somebody might have been hurt!