Actual Headline: Why do police shoot to kill?
At CNN. The expert they interview provides them with the answer that anyone who carries a gun already knows. That this seems shocking to some is a bit of a wonder to me.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
October 2nd, 2016 at 7:11 pm
This makes much more sense than some who say Trump isn’t conservative enough but then endorse Clinton. Many “useful idiot ” supposed liberals support Clinton even though she is an authoritarian fascist.
October 2nd, 2016 at 8:20 pm
Many people view using a gun as a remote control punch.
October 3rd, 2016 at 10:00 am
The article fails to address the fact that “shooting to wound” would be a defacto admission that the officer didn’t feel his life was in danger, and thus would make it illegal for him to shoot at all.
October 3rd, 2016 at 2:53 pm
When someone asks, “Why didn’t the (cop, homeowner, etc.) shoot him in the leg?”, my response is typically along the lines of. “Well, leaving him to bleed out in the gutter from a severed artery sounds pretty harsh to me, but I guess you’re OK with that sort of thing”.
October 4th, 2016 at 5:08 pm
Having seen Facebook threads on this, my impression is that lots of people watch too much TV and movies,and thus think shooting people in the leg or arm or shooting a weapon out of their hand is Totally Something Plausible…