The Trumpening
The Chicago Tribune endorses Gary Johnson for president. A few other smaller papers have done the same but this seems like kind of a significant development.
The Chicago Tribune endorses Gary Johnson for president. A few other smaller papers have done the same but this seems like kind of a significant development.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
October 2nd, 2016 at 5:05 pm
A clear indicator they believe DJT will win. Chicago supporting a libertarian is one of the four signs of the apocalypse.
October 2nd, 2016 at 7:51 pm
@Tim, Gary Johson seems to me to have a lot of leftist philosophy mixed in with his libertarianism. I voted for Ron Paul, but Gary, you’re no Ron Paul.
October 2nd, 2016 at 8:17 pm
http://i.imgur.com/vje6k0f.jpg
October 2nd, 2016 at 8:56 pm
What do you do when you choice is one of three dems for pres? Buy more ammo, that’s what.
October 2nd, 2016 at 9:15 pm
Listen, if a chitown paper endorsed the beast they know they would be stupid…if they endorsed the Donald they know they would be dead…this little retard was a pretty safe bet, and gets ’em some points for cool:
Remember the pic of the basement dweller at Tam’s asking “Do you know what caliber I’m shooting? Probably not, it’s pretty obscure.”
Yeah, like that.
October 2nd, 2016 at 9:21 pm
Sorry, it was gun, not caliber:
http://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com/2016/09/21st-century-hipster-bulldog.html
Hilarious though. And you know that hipster doofus is a GJ man.
October 3rd, 2016 at 8:02 am
It is still just an attempt to influence the outcome. If they endorse Clinton, no one would be surprised and Trump supporters would ignore it. No voters will swing from Hillary to Johnson. The only votes they might swing are from Trump to Johnson.
I don’t believe this has anything to do with actual support for Johnson. If you can’t stop Trump supporters, you may be able to deflect them.
October 3rd, 2016 at 8:36 am
@Divemedic, thanks, good link comparing the candidates on some key issues. I noticed that Clinton is for REQUIRED vaccination. That’s a contradiction since she claims to be pro-choice. I suppose she would exempt women–and girls, since they have a right to have control over their own bodies. But isn’t that gender discrimination? I thought she opposed that?