Because anti-gun groups don’t actually care about gun safety
A look at the success of the Eddie Eagle program.
4 Responses to “Because anti-gun groups don’t actually care about gun safety”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
October 19th, 2016 at 7:47 pm
Yep, kinda puts their ‘arguments’ to rest, doesn’t it…
October 20th, 2016 at 1:25 am
And now Moms Demand is wholesale stealing Eddie Eagle, outright, without a shred of attribution or whatnot.
Even they admit it works.
October 20th, 2016 at 12:09 pm
I’d let Moms Demand use it, if they actually are teaching gun safety like Eddie Eagle. Then publicly note that after only several decades, Moms Demand has agreed through their actions that the NRA was correct all along.
October 20th, 2016 at 4:44 pm
You have to be able to translate from Left-Speak to English. Just as Freedom of Religion means Freedom FROM Religion (with the one exception being Islam), and Freedom of Speech means Freedom FROM Speech, gun “Safety” means being safe FROM the existence of privately-owned guns.
And so it is that, if you can translate, the Progressive/communist left is actually far more consistent in their rhetoric and in their advocacy, as compared to most “conservatives”. I submit that that is why they’ve been generally more successful over the last 120 years or so.