But AR-15s are only for the battlefield!
A homeowner’s 19 year old son shot and killed three would be burglars with an AR-15.
A homeowner’s 19 year old son shot and killed three would be burglars with an AR-15.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
March 28th, 2017 at 7:24 pm
That was a “battlefield” then.
March 29th, 2017 at 7:55 am
Humm… at 19, maybe room mate might be more appropriate? Heh.
March 29th, 2017 at 9:16 am
I love a story with a happy ending.
March 29th, 2017 at 4:12 pm
“See? We TOLD YOU gun nuts it was only for mass murders!!”
March 29th, 2017 at 4:30 pm
Feel good story of the year.
March 29th, 2017 at 6:44 pm
Another “catastrophic error in victim selection” where the perps got what they needed instead of what they wanted
March 30th, 2017 at 8:45 am
I wonder if the “Exchange of words” included “Get some!”
March 31st, 2017 at 3:23 pm
And a battlefield is what it was, once the intruders entered the home.
April 1st, 2017 at 6:15 am
And now the surviving relatives are screaming that “it wasn’t FAIR” that the target of their criminal clan defended himself effectively. Hopefully, OK law has a “no lawsuits when justified” clause.
April 1st, 2017 at 7:31 am
Saw one article on this story with the headline “Oklahoma Man Kills Three Teens With AR 15.” Excellent illustration of the difference between factual and true.