I commented, because I couldn’t resist pointing out their use of this line “We apply this standard regardless of the lobbying or advocacy group being written about in a column.” Now why would they think that line was necessary?
Her side of the story was that she was suspended, then she quit because, while they were paying her, they weren’t paying her enough to take the abuse that followed. Then the SLT leaked the story of her suspension without mentioning that she had terminated the contract.
May 4th, 2017 at 10:49 am
I commented, because I couldn’t resist pointing out their use of this line “We apply this standard regardless of the lobbying or advocacy group being written about in a column.” Now why would they think that line was necessary?
May 4th, 2017 at 11:09 am
Her side of the story was that she was suspended, then she quit because, while they were paying her, they weren’t paying her enough to take the abuse that followed. Then the SLT leaked the story of her suspension without mentioning that she had terminated the contract.
May 5th, 2017 at 9:58 am
@dandydon, because they want us to know that if she was associated with the ACLU or the NAACP, the same standard would apply. Right?