That’s what happens when you have rules for some people but not others. In this case the cops can buy guns that the peasants cannot… so the cops sell the guns to the peasants that want them.
Buying and selling off-roster guns seems to be a state level violation. If he was buying legally and selling legally, with a background check, is he really guilty of being an unlicensed gun dealer?
May 4th, 2017 at 10:40 pm
That is very similar to the collection I lost in the canoe accident.
May 4th, 2017 at 11:06 pm
HL: LOL!
May 5th, 2017 at 8:53 am
That’s what happens when you have rules for some people but not others. In this case the cops can buy guns that the peasants cannot… so the cops sell the guns to the peasants that want them.
Why is that so difficult to believe?
May 5th, 2017 at 11:38 am
My oh my, some of those are pretty nice. Not enough foreign milsurp or real old stuff for my taste, but a lot more pricey than anything I own.
May 5th, 2017 at 1:16 pm
re the ATF story: I didn’t realize that Glock 42’s had a .38 variation. My tax dollars at work.
May 6th, 2017 at 7:19 am
Buying and selling off-roster guns seems to be a state level violation. If he was buying legally and selling legally, with a background check, is he really guilty of being an unlicensed gun dealer?
May 8th, 2017 at 4:52 pm
Normally “arsenal” claims from media are laughable.
That’s not a bad collection for two guys, though.
Pity about the questionable or illegal (not sure on the exact details) aspect.
(I’ll give them a pass on changing “.380” to “.38”; only enthusiasts are likely to realize the trailing zero is meaningful.)
May 8th, 2017 at 4:53 pm
(Er, one guy.)