“Ho” – Heterosexuals and others. Much easier, and suits the holiday season if repeatedly used. Ho, Ho, Ho!
Or for the more religious among us, “No.” Normals and others. Or perhaps “So,” as in “So what?” for those of us who could not care less where slot A or how peg B is being inserted.
Once an acronym goes beyond four or five letters, it becomes useless. If it changes every few years, it’s doubly useless and an indication of something gravely wrong.
I quite literally looked that acronym up on Snopes, convinced that this was a fabricated story (very much in the “fake but accurate“ camp). I was not able to find anything debunking it. I generally have no issues with what 2 (or more) consenting adults do with each other (as long as they are not harming third parties), but this acronym salad make me laugh and shake my head at the same time. At some point it becomes easier to define a group by what they are not rather than what they are (although that would not be “inclusive“ would it).
We became little godlets, and my, now look what fun we are having trying to put this all back together again. Or, having madly scrambled things, we could return to the original plan but I don’t think we’re ready just yet. It’s going to have to get weirder.
November 27th, 2017 at 8:50 pm
Erin has a good take on this: http://lurkingrhythmically.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-scrabble-bag-of-inclusion.html
November 27th, 2017 at 9:58 pm
The “Elementary Teachers Federation”.
Beyond stupid, with these sick fucks exposed to young children, there might not be any future.
November 27th, 2017 at 10:43 pm
“Ho” – Heterosexuals and others. Much easier, and suits the holiday season if repeatedly used. Ho, Ho, Ho!
Or for the more religious among us, “No.” Normals and others. Or perhaps “So,” as in “So what?” for those of us who could not care less where slot A or how peg B is being inserted.
November 28th, 2017 at 10:48 am
Once an acronym goes beyond four or five letters, it becomes useless. If it changes every few years, it’s doubly useless and an indication of something gravely wrong.
November 28th, 2017 at 10:57 am
I quite literally looked that acronym up on Snopes, convinced that this was a fabricated story (very much in the “fake but accurate“ camp). I was not able to find anything debunking it. I generally have no issues with what 2 (or more) consenting adults do with each other (as long as they are not harming third parties), but this acronym salad make me laugh and shake my head at the same time. At some point it becomes easier to define a group by what they are not rather than what they are (although that would not be “inclusive“ would it).
November 28th, 2017 at 12:44 pm
We became little godlets, and my, now look what fun we are having trying to put this all back together again. Or, having madly scrambled things, we could return to the original plan but I don’t think we’re ready just yet. It’s going to have to get weirder.
November 28th, 2017 at 1:48 pm
Sorry SJWs, LGBT is my line in the sand.
November 29th, 2017 at 1:16 am
Isn’t it transphobic to devalue the T by pushing it farther down the line? They clearly need to print updated scorecards for the grievance olympics.
November 29th, 2017 at 12:09 pm
There’s a reason I’ve taken to using “LGBTEIEIO.”