Some animals are more equal than others
A Santa Fe survivor and CNN (believe it or not) press Pelosi on armed security at schools noting that the building they were in had armed guards. And Pelosi’s office does too.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
June 1st, 2018 at 9:02 am
Water is still wet Jack.
June 1st, 2018 at 5:20 pm
They’re afraid of us for one reason– They’re afraid we might be almost as unprincipled, angry, undisciplined, fearful and violent as they. They’re afraid we might give them what they have coming. They’re afraid of justice, but that’s not our job. Truth is out job and truth will provide justice, all in its own way.
June 2nd, 2018 at 9:09 am
Right Lyle, they take from others what they have and keep for themselves. It’s what criminals do.
June 2nd, 2018 at 9:40 am
Sorry for the length of this, but so happens a commenter who calls himself eon wrote this at DayByDay Cartoon this morning, and following it is my reply…
“eon
Jun 02 2018 at 4:57 am
As H. Beam Piper pointed out (see Lord Kalvan of Otherwhen) the “Great Charter” was forced on King John at Runnymede by his dukes, counts and barons. Its purpose was to define and limit what the Crown could do to them, the nobility. It didn’t say a damn thing about the rights of the average yeoman, because the King and the nobility agreed that the peasantry didn’t have any to begin with.
The only reason the English peasantry didn’t end up like their Continental cousins was due to something King Edward I did half a century after Runnymede. He decreed that the Welsh longbow would be the standard weapon of his army, established fixed prices for bows, arrows and etc., and decreed that after Sunday church, and lunch, every able-bodied man should practice with the bow on standard ranges on every village green.
This not only resulted in the English victories at Crecy and Agincourt, it also guaranteed that the nobility tread carefully around their yeoman. A bow that could put a pile arrow through a French knight’s mail could as easily put a broadhead through an English noble’s blouse, if he got a bit too full of himself re things like the comely daughters of his tenants or etc.
You may notice that the later British constitution has nothing like a Second Amendment. The later British nobility learned their lesson from the tales of Robin Hood; just not the one they should have learned.
clear ether
eon
JTC
Jun 02 2018 at 9:28 am
As lovely an explanation of the genesis of 2A as one could ever see right there.
Those who crafted the Constitution were our Founding Fathers but they were also the Sons of “royal” oppression and learned their lessons well.
I would say that little parable should be required reading of every prog like Nanny here, but they would doubtless take it as a warning to the elites to put down the rabble rather than a guide to the latter to defend from the former.”
June 3rd, 2018 at 5:25 pm
I noticed the “assault weapons on the streets” protecting the recent royal wedding, yet the commoners of England are forbidden to protect themselves in their own houses with even the least of weapons. The wicked have and keep for themselves what they take and deny to others. England has devolved into barbarism.
June 4th, 2018 at 5:29 pm
“I noticed the “assault weapons on the streets” protecting the recent royal wedding…”
Yup; those weapons “could be taken from them and used against them” so they’re only compounding the danger…
Well that’s what the leftist agitators try to tell us, and if it applies to us and our arms then it applies to those armed guards. The general thesis is;
“Any attempt to protect against aggression will only escalate the agression.”
They’re threatening us, you see (they’re the agressors).