Don’t go moloning any labe
It’s soon going to become more likely with red flag laws and bump stock shenanigans.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
April 8th, 2019 at 7:36 pm
All the more reason to *never talk to the police*. There is absolutely NOTHING good that will come of it.
Don’t resist, don’t obstruct, don’t offer any information.
April 9th, 2019 at 8:58 am
I think you mean “When…”
April 9th, 2019 at 9:10 am
Sadly, Red Flag laws are written to be self-fulfilling.
Imagine this hypothetical:
– Someone complains that Ravenwood is dangerous.
– Police come to take Ravenwood’s guns.
– Ravenwood resists.
– Then they get to say, “See.. we were right, Ravenwood is dangerous!”
The reasoning is quite circular.
April 9th, 2019 at 10:30 am
@ Ravenwood, “well- said, and that”someone” doesn’t have to swear out a warrant according to the 4th Amendment and Ravenwood isn’t allowed to face his accuser? “Red Flag” laws are to more fully “legalize” criminality by the government.
“Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that Government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the Citizen. In a Government of laws, existence of the Government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself. It invites anarchy. To declare that, in the administration of the law, the end justifies the means would bring a terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine, this Court should resolutely set its face.”
–Louis D. Brandeis, SCOTUS Justice
Dissenting, Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).
April 10th, 2019 at 8:59 pm
Mas struggling with his loyalties, doesn’t want to see his besties get blasted.
April 11th, 2019 at 5:26 pm
@Ron W;
“In a Government of laws, existence of the Government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious….
Yes; that can be taken as a warning, or it can be interpreted as a mission statement for the authoritarians and their marxist agitators.
“Potent” and “omnipresent teacher” huh? So government is god? These people hold themselves in high esteem.
Nay; the scriptures, the Perfect Law of Liberty, upheld by The People as their ultimate example, must be the “potent and omnipresent teacher”. Otherwise else it won’t matter what government does one way or the other.
The Ten Commandments render the very best of all Man’s laws redundant, and we don’t need some judge or senator, nor wanna-be god-king living off of the labors of others, any “pontifex maximus”, to teach us right from wrong.
April 11th, 2019 at 8:20 pm
@Lyle, those are excellent elaborations. Thanks!
April 11th, 2019 at 8:54 pm
@lyle Well said.
April 12th, 2019 at 1:06 pm
Isn’t this sort of thing a good justification for hiding arms and ammunition in such a way that they are unlikely to be found?
April 13th, 2019 at 8:32 pm
Yep, dittybopper, IF, the government obeyed the Law, specifically the wording of the 4th and 5th Amendments, our arms and ammunition would indeed be “unlikely to be found” except maybe by common thieves and robbers who break in and even kill to steal.