A series of mouse-fart loads? Cylinder gap or no, I’m betting that a standard 500 S&W load (on the order of 2,700 ft lbs ME) would kaboom the gun in spectacular fashion after a single squib left a bullet in bore.
Who wants to try it? Send me a thousand dollars or so for a gun to demolish, and I’ll prove it.
Many a gun shop has some example of a stack of bullets inside a gun barrel, or a cartoonishly splayed barrel . What can one say? Some people don’t have the sense God gave them, or they’re firing a gun for the very first time while using bogus ammunition.
April 16th, 2019 at 10:11 pm
The cylinder gap makes it more forgiving, gas has somewhere to go.
Fully locked guns like the AR, bolt actions, etc, are less safe than revolvers, blowback guns like Uzi or MP5, etc
Stacked two up in an MP5 once. Barrel was flawless afterwards.
April 17th, 2019 at 6:00 pm
A series of mouse-fart loads? Cylinder gap or no, I’m betting that a standard 500 S&W load (on the order of 2,700 ft lbs ME) would kaboom the gun in spectacular fashion after a single squib left a bullet in bore.
Who wants to try it? Send me a thousand dollars or so for a gun to demolish, and I’ll prove it.
Many a gun shop has some example of a stack of bullets inside a gun barrel, or a cartoonishly splayed barrel . What can one say? Some people don’t have the sense God gave them, or they’re firing a gun for the very first time while using bogus ammunition.