Let’s say he wore Nike shoes. Does that implicate Nike and all Nike wearers? If a murderer used a Chicago Cutlery steak knife to stab someone, does that implicate Chicago Cutlery and everyone who owns their knives? Of course not. That would be insane, so when the accusation is made, let’s not argue on the enemy’s terms, but dismiss them out of hand, then denounce the accuser for making insane accusations in support of an ulterior, contra-legal agenda.
Anyone willing to entertain such accusations is not on the side of liberty. Only the guilty PERSON is guilty. Not the deodand, or the deodand maker, or the seller, and not any other person who owns a similar deodand.
If we’re fussing over whether the murderer did or did not use a bumpstock, then we’ve taken the bait, and we will surely lose for being too dense, or too distracted to comprehend the tactical landscape or even the very nature of the battle. In engaging their insane premises, we’re showing them that they are indeed in charge of and presiding over the situation.
Likewise, when the little children are acting up, it is the responsibility of the adults to set them straight, and not to get involved, or wrapped-up, in the children’s petty nonsense.
And better for the enemy if they lied about it! Excellent for them! Then, in our focus on the fact of the matter, we’ll be attacking the lie, and thus conceding to the notion of deodand laws, for if we believed in our principles, as we say we do, then the specific hardware the murderer used could not possibly matter to us.
In the legal sense; once sufficient evidence has been found to determine the identity of the perpetrator(s), the remaining details matter no more than the brand of toothpaste he/they used that morning.
If the truth/proof helped the liberal cause, it would have been leaked by now…
All here know that’s the case.
That’s how I KNEW Mueller would come up empty: No evidence leaked… Lots of dem/socialist congress critters IMPLIED evidence was there, but NOTHING leaked.
April 24th, 2019 at 4:34 pm
I’m not sure “the FBI decided they were bump stocks, not BATFE, so it’s obviously fake” is even plausible.
(What, you can’t get BATFE in on a giant conspiracy to ban stuff based on lies, because they’re too honest and dedicated to the letter of the law?
Pull ye other one, it’s got bells on.)
April 24th, 2019 at 4:46 pm
Answer; It makes no difference whatsoever.
Let’s say he wore Nike shoes. Does that implicate Nike and all Nike wearers? If a murderer used a Chicago Cutlery steak knife to stab someone, does that implicate Chicago Cutlery and everyone who owns their knives? Of course not. That would be insane, so when the accusation is made, let’s not argue on the enemy’s terms, but dismiss them out of hand, then denounce the accuser for making insane accusations in support of an ulterior, contra-legal agenda.
Anyone willing to entertain such accusations is not on the side of liberty. Only the guilty PERSON is guilty. Not the deodand, or the deodand maker, or the seller, and not any other person who owns a similar deodand.
If we’re fussing over whether the murderer did or did not use a bumpstock, then we’ve taken the bait, and we will surely lose for being too dense, or too distracted to comprehend the tactical landscape or even the very nature of the battle. In engaging their insane premises, we’re showing them that they are indeed in charge of and presiding over the situation.
Likewise, when the little children are acting up, it is the responsibility of the adults to set them straight, and not to get involved, or wrapped-up, in the children’s petty nonsense.
And better for the enemy if they lied about it! Excellent for them! Then, in our focus on the fact of the matter, we’ll be attacking the lie, and thus conceding to the notion of deodand laws, for if we believed in our principles, as we say we do, then the specific hardware the murderer used could not possibly matter to us.
In the legal sense; once sufficient evidence has been found to determine the identity of the perpetrator(s), the remaining details matter no more than the brand of toothpaste he/they used that morning.
April 25th, 2019 at 1:50 am
Lyle,
I don’t think creative writing is your thing.
April 25th, 2019 at 1:50 am
Lyle,
I don’t think creative writing is your thing.
April 29th, 2019 at 10:31 pm
If the truth/proof helped the liberal cause, it would have been leaked by now…
All here know that’s the case.
That’s how I KNEW Mueller would come up empty: No evidence leaked… Lots of dem/socialist congress critters IMPLIED evidence was there, but NOTHING leaked.