Some of the pictures from Caracas show thousands of people in the street. I don’t quite understand why they don’t mob those trucks and turn them over. That would certainly stop those attacks. Then simply wait for the guys inside to come out and string them up.
The U.S. only has a “2nd Amendment” because the Constitution wasn’t ‘hitting it’ in the same way that the previous “Articles of Confederation” also did not get what we want and demand of/by/for/and from, each other under THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE–which cannot be amended or repealed.
The Declaration states 2 x that you should, and 1 x that it is your “duty” to chuck your government “Whenever” you deem necessary. Our Founders couldn’t have written that, and yet still wanted for you to have to ask for the means or the permission to obtain the means to do so from that same gov’t that needed replacing.
Therefore, the 2nd Amendment requires PARITY of “Arms” (not just guns) with our government. And it is not our fault what that parity might entail.
Socialism is the boot.exe file for communism, and we have The Communist Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 775, 50 U.S.C. 841-844) to handle that, and there is no corresponding “Capitalist Control Act” or “Conservative Control Act”, and WHY? because we’re not POS communists.
789, they might well work. Those things look like reinforced trucks, like the new style HMMWV or the like. For one thing, they have rubber tires, not steel tracks. A decent fire would have it trying to roll on its rims.
I still say that simply rolling the thing over should do nicely. That crowd looks big enough to do the job.
EFPs, nothing says “you’re going to need a bigger boat” like EFPs. Not even an M1 Abrams can withstand them. And they can be made in your kitchen (just ask the Iranian aholes that sold them to AQI in Iraq 2007 for ~$75/piece).
May 1st, 2019 at 7:36 pm
Some of the pictures from Caracas show thousands of people in the street. I don’t quite understand why they don’t mob those trucks and turn them over. That would certainly stop those attacks. Then simply wait for the guys inside to come out and string them up.
May 2nd, 2019 at 9:06 am
The U.S. only has a “2nd Amendment” because the Constitution wasn’t ‘hitting it’ in the same way that the previous “Articles of Confederation” also did not get what we want and demand of/by/for/and from, each other under THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE–which cannot be amended or repealed.
The Declaration states 2 x that you should, and 1 x that it is your “duty” to chuck your government “Whenever” you deem necessary. Our Founders couldn’t have written that, and yet still wanted for you to have to ask for the means or the permission to obtain the means to do so from that same gov’t that needed replacing.
Therefore, the 2nd Amendment requires PARITY of “Arms” (not just guns) with our government. And it is not our fault what that parity might entail.
May 2nd, 2019 at 9:10 am
Socialism is the boot.exe file for communism, and we have The Communist Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 775, 50 U.S.C. 841-844) to handle that, and there is no corresponding “Capitalist Control Act” or “Conservative Control Act”, and WHY? because we’re not POS communists.
May 2nd, 2019 at 9:37 am
Hmmm… would molotov cocktails work against a vehicle like that?
I know they were used against tanks many years ago. Are these better protected?
May 2nd, 2019 at 5:30 pm
789, they might well work. Those things look like reinforced trucks, like the new style HMMWV or the like. For one thing, they have rubber tires, not steel tracks. A decent fire would have it trying to roll on its rims.
I still say that simply rolling the thing over should do nicely. That crowd looks big enough to do the job.
May 3rd, 2019 at 11:39 am
EFPs, nothing says “you’re going to need a bigger boat” like EFPs. Not even an M1 Abrams can withstand them. And they can be made in your kitchen (just ask the Iranian aholes that sold them to AQI in Iraq 2007 for ~$75/piece).